Rep. Ellison said the Justice
Department should investigate the
allegations and get on with the
important work of building
relationships based upon mutual
trust and respect.
“There are several cities where the
Muslim community works closely with
law enforcement officials, including
the FBI, to ensure that our rights
as citizens are upheld, and our
religious practices are respected
and protected from rogue individuals
pursuing an agenda,” Rep. Ellison
said.
During a March 25 Senate Judiciary
Committee hearing on oversight of
the FBI, lawmakers questioned
Director John Mueller about the
mosque infiltrations, and sought
answers about then-Attorney General
Michael Mukasey's plans to revise
guidelines to allow the FBI to
implement intrusive investigative
methods with no probable cause or
compelling evidence.
Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) told
Mr. Mueller he was disappointed to
learn that some Muslim groups were
threatening outreach suspension. He
specifically asked Dir. Mueller to
disclose whether FBI agents under
the Attorney General Guidelines
entered mosques, and if so how many.
“I, uh, there are a number of
questions in there. I, I, uh, would
hesitate to, uh, uh, provide
information on ongoing
investigations. Quite obviously I
will say that we do not focus on
institutions. We focus on
individuals. And I will say
generally that if there is evidence
or information as to an individual
or individuals undertaking illegal
activities in religious
institutions, with appropriate high
level approval, we would undertake
investigative activities, regardless
of the religion,” Dir. Mueller said,
during the hearing. He stuck to his
answer when asked if that included
entering a Muslim mosque under a
different identity.
In a recent statement commemorating
the FBI's 100th anniversary, Dir.
Mueller said, “It is not enough to
stop the terrorist—we must stop him
while maintaining his civil
liberties, and civil rights.”
Critics told The Final Call
sending agent provocateurs into
Muslim houses of worship not only
violated civil liberties, but also
violated the sanctity of these
sanctuaries. The last thing needed
is for people who attend mosques to
feel insecure and like they are
being watched; the FBI has infringed
on their religious freedoms, critics
said.
Lawyers Guild blasts
violation of Constitution
Jim Lafferty, executive director of
the National Lawyers Guild in Los
Angeles, labeled the FBI's use of
agent provocateurs a disgraceful
violation of the Constitutional
right to freely practice one's
religion, religious and racial
profiling at its worst, and a
perpetuation of the myth that
Muslims are less patriotic and more
likely to commit acts of violence
than others.
“It is exactly what the FBI did in
the ‘60s and ‘70s under its
discredited and outlawed
COINTELPRO policy. It seeks to
disrupt, discredit and criminalize
the Muslim community. And as is now
clear from the testimony of the
agent provocateur used by the FBI in
Southern California to infiltrate
mosques, it is designed to provide
the FBI with an excuse to prosecute
those who are guilty of no crime,
based upon the perjured testimony of
the agent provocateur ... who in
this case was, himself, a convicted
criminal with a long criminal
record! And it serves to further
spread the false idea among the
American population as a whole, that
Muslims are not to be trusted,”
Atty. Lafferty told The Final
Call.
He recommended that the Southern
California Muslim community stop
cooperating with the FBI, since
their years of doing so has resulted
in nothing other than more
violations of their rights by the
FBI. Instead, he said, the mosques
that were spied on should sue the
government and protest the rights
violations.
“If the general public does not
speak up against that repression,
one day we can wake up to find the
repression is complete and that none
of us are safe to pray in our
churches, or assemble in our union
halls, or express our opposition to
government policy when we disagree
with what our government is doing.
So we must come to the defense of
our Muslim sisters and brothers now,
for their sake and for our own sake,
as well,” Atty. Lafferty warned.
Dawud Walid, executive director of
the Michigan Chapter of the Council
on American-Islamic Relations, said
when news broke about the mosque
infiltrations, he quickly reflected
on the plight of seven Black Muslim
males that were set up for
entrapment by the FBI in Liberty
City, Fla.
Six of the “Liberty City Seven” were
brought to trial twice for allegedly
planning to bomb Chicago's Sears
Tower and FBI offices. They faced 70
years in prison, but both cases
ended in mistrials. The seventh
member was acquitted altogether.
“The recent events in Southern
California are McCarthy Era-type
tactics that the FBI has used at
various times in its history, so it
was very disappointing to hear about
it and the situation. But at the
same time, it wasn't a total
surprise because the FBI has a
history of such behaviors going back
to COINTELPRO under its late
Director J. Edgar Hoover,” Mr. Walid
said.
He has no tangible proof of agent
provocateurs being sent into mosques
in his area, but has often received
complaints from Muslims who say
they've been approached by the FBI
to spy on mosques. Many were
immigrants with green cards, seeking
citizenship and their status was
allegedly used as leverage to get
them to cooperate, or face jail time
or deportation, he said.
“I would suspect that such
activities are going on throughout
the United States of America, not
just Los Angeles. We don't think
that such tactics were from one
field office independent of direct
headquarters in Washington, D.C. ...
It was most likely not confined to
Los Angeles, but it's possibly going
on in Chicago, Detroit, New York,
and other metropolitan areas with
other large concentrations of
Muslims,” Mr. Walid said.
“Another thing is it's ironic that
when we look at what took place in
Oklahoma, it was two White men that
were disgruntled with America who
did the bombings in Oklahoma, a very
tragic event,” observed Omar
Montgomery, an adjunct professor at
the University of Colorado at Denver
in Ethnic Studies and African
American Studies. He is also a
member of the Association of Black
Psychologists.
“For some reason a lot of these
White terrorist organizations seem
to get a pass, but organizations
that are predominantly either
African American or Arabic seem to
be over-scrutinized, yet these other
predominantly White organizations
who have historically terrorized,
caused physical harm, and even on
their websites they talk about the
assassination of Barack Obama go
under the radar. Arabic or Black
organizations are paraded around on
the news, dehumanized and the
community is turned against the
organization,” said Prof.
Montgomery.
“There has to be some equity in law
enforcement.If you're going to
target Black organizations, also
target these White organizations
that blatantly say who they want to
kill, who they want to target and
who they hate. I don't recall seeing
any mosque that I know of located in
the United States talking about they
hate Jews and they want to
exterminate the Jews. Yet when
Barack Obama was running for office
there were several White
organizations that almost put a
ransom out for Barack Obama's
head.How come those organizations
are not targeted and if they are it
should be just as public as they do
for Black and Arab organizations,”
he added.
Government actions denounced
Groups like the Council on
American-Islamic Relations, the
American Muslim Task Force on Civil
Rights and Elections, and the Muslim
Public Affairs Council swiftly
denounced the FBI's actions and
moved to prevent future
infiltrations of mosques throughout
the U.S.
CAIR obtained a restraining order
against Craig Monteilh, who has
admitted he was paid by the FBI to
go undercover in Southern California
mosques to track terrorists.
According to Dr. Agha Saeed,
executive director of the American
Muslim Task Force there has been an
informal suspension of outreach in
that the FBI has not contacted
Muslim groups, though a few groups
have met with agents.
The task force demanded that the
FBI:
• Stop infiltrating mosques and
interfering with the religious
perspective of Muslims by creating
false conversions to Islam;
• Stop entrapment;
• Respect the constitutional rights
of CAIR and other groups to petition
the government to seek a redress for
grievances;
• Stop collapsing indictments into
convictions; and
• Stop using taxpayer money to
create false understandings and
impressions of Islam under local law
enforcement agencies.
“So regardless of if the FBI does or
does not behave we are going to make
these five demands a set of national
demands, create awareness around
them among Muslims and fellow
Americans and enlist their support
to fix these problems. We're not
just going to sit and wait for the
FBI to respond,” Dr. Saeed told
The Final Call.
According to Edina Lekovic,
communications director for the
Muslim Public Affairs Council, her
group and the Islamic Society of
North America, the Muslim Students
Association National, the Arab
American Institute and the American
Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
met with the FBI on March 17 to
confront the issue head on and
demand greater transparency
regarding FBI guidelines, and
particularly opposing the use of
paid informants in mosques.
“There is a line that is crossed
when houses of worship become the
sites for investigations, regardless
of whether we think those are
legitimate or not ... how do you
ensure that informants, even agent
provocateurs, are not crossing the
line?” Ms. Lekovic asked.
During the meeting, the groups
shared the importance of the FBI
engaging all Muslim organizations,
based on the agency's decision to
stop communicating with CAIR.
Basically, the groups stressed their
collective belief that the FBI,
along with other government
agencies, need to engage with the
broadest number of Muslim
organizations possible, and said it
is counterproductive to disengage
from an organization as mainstream
and as large as CAIR, Ms. Lekovic
continued.
“The FBI has had to limit its formal
contact with CAIR field offices
until certain issues are addressed
by CAIR's national headquarters.
CAIR's leadership is aware of this.
Beyond that, we have no further
comment,” Dir. Mueller said in a
brief press statement.
During a phone interview, Laura
Eimiller, FBI spokesperson, added
that the FBI does not comment on
investigative methods such as the
use of informants or human
resources, in order to avoid
jeopardizing the safety of
personnel, ongoing cases and
impartial outcomes for the accused.
“We do not confirm or deny claims by
individuals, statements by
individuals, who claim to be
informants,” she told The Final
Call.
The main two courses of action
debated upon by Muslim organizations
are the American Muslim Task Force's
call for suspensions of outreach
efforts and the desire to maintain
engagement by several other
organizations. Ms. Lekovic believes
that all of the approaches are
necessary.
“We're united in our message and
we're just adopting different
approaches to getting that message
across. I think there are people out
there who will use that difference
in approach as an opportunity to sow
divisions and mislead people into
thinking that we are not unified and
nothing could be further from the
truth,” she said.